Subject: Mail digest
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 22:58:07 +0200 (METDST)
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Dancing trees for All the list - from Meytal Shpindel ISRAEL
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 13:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
Comments: Originally To: [email protected] (All the list)
X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44
You have just received an animated greeting card from Meytal Shpindel ISRAEL
You'll see the personal greeting by using the following Web location.
http://www1.bluemountain.com/cards/box5379i/jkm3ezemfihbtm.htm
(Your greeting card will be available for the next 90 days)
There is no charge for this service! :) HAVE a good day and have fun!
____________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates your agreement with our Website Rules
posted at the bottom of the following Web location: (You're welcome to send a
card at no charge to someone at this location)
http://www.bluemountain.com/
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: [Mandy_FANtinkins] Fwd: NEW VOTING BOOTH - BEST MALE (TV/Fil
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 00:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
Comments: Originally To: "Ted Neeley" "Mailing List" ,
Mandy Patinkin Mailing List1 ,
"Mandy Patinkin Mailing List"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44
Okay guys - Ted has 103 votes, Mandy has 57 votes -
nice work so far, but our guys need MORE HELP - the
list leader, Michael Biehn, has 57,822 votes. See how
much work we have to do? Remember, you can vote as
many days as you want, and 5 times each day - so you
can cast as many as 35 votes per week for one person.
Cindi
Note: forwarded message attached.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: [Mandy_FANtinkins] Fwd: NEW VOTING BOOTH - BEST MALE (TV/Fil
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 00:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
Comments: Originally To: "Ted Neeley" "Mailing List" ,
"Mandy Patinkin Mailing List"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1714636915-946198573=:11875"
X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44
--0-1714636915-946198573=:11875
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Note: forwarded message attached.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--0-1714636915-946198573=:11875
Content-Type: message/rfc822
X-Apparently-To: [email protected] via web1903.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track2: 2
X-Track: -50
Received: from pop1.onelist.com (HELO onelist.com) (209.207.164.233)
by mta101.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 08:53:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 28398 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 1999 08:53:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 28391 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 08:53:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (209.207.164.241) by pop1.onelist.com with QMQP; 26 Dec 1999 08:53:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web1904.mail.yahoo.com) (128.11.23.53) by 209.207.164.241 with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 09:59:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 24375 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 1999 08:53:03 -0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Received: from [209.81.211.31] by web1904.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 26 Dec 1999 00:53:03 PST
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 00:53:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Jane Doey
To: "Ted Neeley" "Mailing List" , Mandy Patinkin Mailing List1 , "Mandy Patinkin Mailing List"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list [email protected]; contact [email protected]
Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Reply-to: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: [Mandy_FANtinkins] Fwd: NEW VOTING BOOTH - BEST MALE (TV/Film)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 998
From: Jane Doey
Okay guys - Ted has 103 votes, Mandy has 57 votes -
nice work so far, but our guys need MORE HELP - the
list leader, Michael Biehn, has 57,822 votes. See how
much work we have to do? Remember, you can vote as
many days as you want, and 5 times each day - so you
can cast as many as 35 votes per week for one person.
Cindi
Note: forwarded message attached.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE TYPING FOR YOU!
Tired of filling out forms and remembering passwords? Gator fills in
forms and passwords with just one click! Comes with $50 in free coupons!
Click Here
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Mandy Patinkin -- A Musical Force of Nature!"
--0-1714636915-946198573=:11875--
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Voting for favorite stars (off? on?)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:34:44 EST
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
Comments: Originally To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 38 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44)
Does anybody besides me think it's silly to vote in these polls? I know whom
I think to be fabulous, and whom I consider seriously lame and overrated, and
other people have their minds made up, too. Now if all this voting was
really a means of discussing and changing viewpoints, then maybe it would
serve a purpose. But to just stuff the ballot box over and over until you
"drown out" someone else-- why go to the effort? What's been changed?
What's been proven? Why is this an important thing to do?
DMNY
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Voting for favorite stars (off? on?)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:54:33 -0600
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Comments: Originally To: [email protected]
At 10:34 AM 12/26/99 EST, [email protected] wrote:
>Does anybody besides me think it's silly to vote in these polls? I know whom
>I think to be fabulous, and whom I consider seriously lame and overrated, and
>other people have their minds made up, too. Now if all this voting was
>really a means of discussing and changing viewpoints, then maybe it would
>serve a purpose. But to just stuff the ballot box over and over until you
>"drown out" someone else-- why go to the effort? What's been changed?
>What's been proven? Why is this an important thing to do?
I have posed this very question before and been called a fun-sucking old
poop (I may have some consonants transposed, but the meaning is the same).
These online polls, unless they have foolproof means of preventing repeat
voting, only prove whose fans are sufficiently deficient in "a life" to sit
and stuff the ballot box all day. Apparently Michael Biehn's fans hold that
title for the nonce.
The short answer (which you will probably received phrased 20 different
ways) is that it's "fun". Right. ;)
DR <-- off to finish Christmas shopping (yes....I know.....) and grocery
shop; fun in the real world ;)
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Voting for favorite stars (off? on?)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 11:59:02 -0500
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Comments: Originally To: [email protected]
At 10:34 AM 12/26/99 EST, you wrote:
>Does anybody besides me think it's silly to vote in these polls? I know whom
>I think to be fabulous, and whom I consider seriously lame and overrated, and
>other people have their minds made up, too. Now if all this voting was
>really a means of discussing and changing viewpoints, then maybe it would
>serve a purpose. But to just stuff the ballot box over and over until you
>"drown out" someone else-- why go to the effort? What's been changed?
>What's been proven? Why is this an important thing to do?
>
>DMNY
>
IMO it is a waste of time, and I don't do it, But if it rings someone
else's chime, feel free.
Brenda
Brenda W. Clough, author of HOW LIKE A GOD from Tor Books.
http://www.sff.net/people/Brenda
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Voting for favorite stars (off? on?)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 14:43:21 EST
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
Comments: Originally To: [email protected], [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 45 (via Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44)
In a message dated 12/26/1999 8:55:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<<
I have posed this very question before and been called a fun-sucking old
poop (I may have some consonants transpose >>
Is it possible for both things to be true ???? Its silly and stupid AND your
a....
Oh now wait... its Christmas.... Merry Christmas you ol poop!
KJ
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Voting for favorite stars (off? on?)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 13:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Errors-to:
Sender: [email protected]
X-listname:
Comments: Originally To: [email protected], [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mercury MTS (Bindery) v1.44
My thoughts exactly.
--- [email protected] wrote:
> Does anybody besides me think it's silly to vote in
> these polls? I know whom
> I think to be fabulous, and whom I consider
> seriously lame and overrated, and
> other people have their minds made up, too. Now if
> all this voting was
> really a means of discussing and changing
> viewpoints, then maybe it would
> serve a purpose. But to just stuff the ballot box
> over and over until you
> "drown out" someone else-- why go to the effort?
> What's been changed?
> What's been proven? Why is this an important thing
> to do?
>
> DMNY
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------Message-boundary--
-- End --