From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Mail digest
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 5:19:55 +0200 (METDST)

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: York Madness
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 22:29:25 -0400 (EDT)

At 06:23 PM 10/2/99 -0700, you wrote:
>You are lucky that you have KathiJo and Wendy. I just
>can't seem to muster the courage to walk into a
>theatre for Elmo! :o) Especially since everytime I go
>to the theatre, I end up in line with kids in my
>class. I can just imagine their faces when they ask,
>"Which movie are you seeing Mrs. Jorgensen?" and I
>reply,"Elmo..." I'm just not brave enough to take the
>razzing from a bunch of my middle school kids! LOL! 
>

If you lived near me we could go together.  Tip: tell them you're writing a
review of the film.  (You could post it here, to make it true.)  I am
planning to wait until school is in session, and go in the middle of the day.

Brenda
Brenda W. Clough, author of HOW LIKE A GOD from Tor Books.
http://www.sff.net/people/Brenda


----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP:  CH/Elmo
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 23:27:57 EDT

In a message dated 10/1/99 7:21:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< DEK stated at a press conference that they Natasha Gregson Wagner was
 originally intended to appeal to a younger demographic.  Instead, she was
 dropped and Barbra Hershey added to appeal to the older demographic that
 tends to watch CBS (and would tune in to CH after Diagnosis Murder no
 doubt). >>


Well, I'm 43 - I'm sure their "target audience" and honey, I'll take that 
cute little firm body of Natasha's anyday over the surgically implanted and 
lifted Barbara Hershey's.  Just because I'm getting older - doesn't mean I 
want to see those aging not too gracefully!  Sorry to be so hard on Barabara, 
but give us a break!
And Mandy too.......didn't you feel the chemistry between he and Natasha?  
There ain't any between he and Barbara.   I guess we'll see how good of an 
actor he really is, if he can heat up that pair.....

Sharon

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Galveston concert
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 23:28:26 EDT

In a message dated 10/1/99 7:28:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] 
writes:

<< Does anyone have any idea where Mandy will stay when he does this concert? 
>>


My bedroom - duuuhhhhh!

Sharon

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: York Madness
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 23:31:07 EDT

In a message dated 10/2/1999 3:52:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< 
 And I can't believe that Kathryn called him while he was meeting with you
 guys.  I love that he said he couldn't talk with her right then.  At least
 he has his priorities straight!   :-)))   I'm surprised he has a cell
 phone -- I thought Kathryn didn't want him to have one a few years ago
 because he could get brain cancer from it or some such thing!  Looks like
 she's come around! >>

Well he was surrounded by wacky women fans--and in an alley, so it was hard 
to chat. I think Kathryn must have been calling because she figured the show 
would be over and he would be heading home in the limo.

--C

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy News from the York Concert
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 23:32:09 EDT

In a message dated 10/2/99 10:01:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< .oh yeah, we ran into Mandy in the elevator of the hotel on 
 his way to the gym, so he had a tee shirt and very tight shorts on ----and 
he is really thin! >>


Tight shorts?  As in bike shorts?  Come on - tell us more~    Every detail!

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Galveston concert
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 12:18:36 EDT

In a message dated 10/2/99 8:29:41 PM, [email protected] writes:

<>
>>

no but questions like this....and expected answers....are bordering on the 
"invasive" side........

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: OT: ICQ
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 19:30:59 +0100

Hi all,

does anyone have ICQ and if, would you allow me to add you to my list?
Bye, thanx, Nadine (ICC# 51100509)

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: OT: ICQ
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 19:31:12 +0100

Hi all,

does anyone have ICQ and if, would you allow me to add you to my list?
Bye, thanx, Nadine (ICQ# 51100509)

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy News from the York Concert
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 11:36:50 -0700 (PDT)

I for one (and I may be the only one) am glad that MP
doesn't look really thin on the show. For me really
skinny guys are a turn off. ( and no I'm not fat!)
Renee

--- [email protected] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/2/99 10:01:53 AM Pacific
> Daylight Time, 
> [email protected] writes:
> 
> << .oh yeah, we ran into Mandy in the elevator of
> the hotel on 
>  his way to the gym, so he had a tee shirt and very
> tight shorts on ----and 
> he 
>  is really thin! >>
> 
> 
> Tight shorts?  As in bike shorts?  Come on - tell us
> more~    Every detail!
> 


=====

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP:  CH
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT)

I agree...on the bright side though, DEK seems to
recycle his actors, so MP might turn up on the
Practice or Alley next season. A character like
Geiger, only not a doctor, would fit in either show.
Maybe as the D.A. which, imho, could use some
retooling anyway.
Renee- finally got to see a tape of the premier and
loved it...but there is no way Alicia could be in
first grade (looks much older)
--- "[email protected]" 
wrote:
> There have been comments about "saving CH". 
> Frankly, I am not sure DEK
> ever intended to save CH so it can continue for a
> few more years.  I think
> his intention was to get another year out of it and
> hopefully go out on a
> better note than what we saw last year.  (He was
> highly criticized for what
> happened to Picket Fences and the way it was
> canceled, and perhaps didn't
> want to see a repeat of that with Hope.)
> 
> Many of DEK's moves of late seem to be primarily
> money-motivated (the
> half-hour "Ally"; the creation of "Snoops" to
> satisfy terms of his
> multimillion dollar contract with ABC, though it is 
> not up to DEK's normal
> standard; a couple of movies which he has not
> received particularly good
> reviews for).  I think DEK is far too busy writing
> good episodes for Ally
> McBeal and The Practice to worry too  much about CH
> or Snoops or much of
> anything else.
> 
> phantm
>
############################################################
> The Peter MacNicol Page         Mandy Patinkin
> Showcase
> http://www.petermacnicol.net 
> http://www.mandypatinkin.net
>
############################################################
> 


=====

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: ICQ
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 13:35:02 -0700

Hey!! Yeah, I have ICQ, AOL IM, and YAhoo! Messenger....  My ICQ# is 43489937, the the name that'll show up is LVxPhile. For both AOL IM and Yahoo! Messenger, it's LVxPhile. I love to talk about XF anytime so, I'd be happy to talk to anyone that wants to talk about XF. :-) Oh and Dana (Nadine), I hope you don't mind, but I alreaddy added you to my list. :-) TTYL!!!

LVxPhile
---
Editor-In-Chief of the X-Phile eXpedition, DFHB, GAWS, SPCDD, XFFC, Temple of Modell
-~*-~*-~*

Please sign my guestbook at my X-Files website at http://www.angelfire.com/ms/xfilesrealm/index.html


On Sun, 03 Oct 1999 19:30:59   danascx wrote:
>DFHB - http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dimension/4549/DFHB/
>
>Hi all,
>
>does anyone have ICQ and if, would you allow me to add you to my list?
>Bye, thanx, Nadine (ICC# 51100509)
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, write to [email protected]
>Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/
>


Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: ICQ
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 22:47:05 +0100

Hi,

i saw you added me--thanx :) i added you too! bye! ;)

Nadine

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: ICQ
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 23:38:47 +0100

Oh by the way... people who luv X-Files AND Mandy/Chicago Hope are the
coolest anyway!! :)

LVxPhile schrieb:
> 
> Hey!! Yeah, I have ICQ, AOL IM, and YAhoo! Messenger....  My ICQ# is 43489937, the the name that'll show up is LVxPhile. For both AOL IM and Yahoo! Messenger, it's LVxPhile. I love to talk about XF anytime so, I'd be happy to talk to anyone that wants to talk about XF. :-) Oh and Dana (Nadine), I hope you don't mind, but I alreaddy added you to my list. :-) TTYL!!!
> 
> LVxPhile
> ---
> Editor-In-Chief of the X-Phile eXpedition, DFHB, GAWS, SPCDD, XFFC, Temple of Modell
> -~*-~*-~*
> 
> Please sign my guestbook at my X-Files website at http://www.angelfire.com/ms/xfilesrealm/index.html
> 
> On Sun, 03 Oct 1999 19:30:59   danascx wrote:
> >DFHB - http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dimension/4549/DFHB/
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >does anyone have ICQ and if, would you allow me to add you to my list?
> >Bye, thanx, Nadine (ICC# 51100509)
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________________________________
> >To unsubscribe, write to [email protected]
> >Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/
> >
> 
> Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
> Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Mandy in York, PA 10/1/99
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 18:28:05 EDT

--part1_ad392de4.25293275_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-path: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Full-name: EMMYDANCE
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 18:25:37 EDT
Subject: Re: Mandy in York, PA 10/1/99
To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 14

In a message dated 10/2/1999 12:14:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< Triplets (at the request of a little girl on the stage after 
 Coffee...Cardboard Cup) >>
so cool! that's one of his numbers that i choreographed to.  i sent him the 
video five weeks ago and haven't heard anything yet........
deb

--part1_ad392de4.25293275_boundary--

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: York concert photos
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 19:10:13 -0400

Hi -

There are some pictures taken after the York concert on my web site now, if
you'd like to see them.  Just go to the main page (URL below) and then click
on either "Updates to Site" or "My Concert Photos" to find them.  Sorry, no
elevator pictures in those tight shorts.......  ;)

-Char

********************************************************************
   Mandy Patinkin - High Flying Adored
   http://home.att.net/~mosert/char/mandy.htm
********************************************************************


----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: ICQ
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 19:32:08 EDT

In a message dated 10/3/99 4:40:41 PM EST, [email protected] writes:

<< I have ICQ, >>

Ok I am curious, I admit. Can anyone tell me what ICQ is?????????
Ina

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Mandy's Elmo song
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 17:00:35 -0700

>At 06:21 PM 10/02/1999 -0400, Brenda and Larry Clough wrote:
>>And-is- the song on the album?  Was this ever positively determined?
>
>
>It is not on the album.  I suspect promoters may have figured that parents
>might not approve of their children singing along to a tune about greed and
>"making it mine".
>
>phantm
>


When we saw the movie last night, we noticed in the song credits that
Mandy's song was produced by Nonesuch Records.  Is it possible that his song
is not on the Elmo album because his record label will not let him appear on
other labels?

/ Joanne




----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy's Elmo song
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 17:15:58 -0700 (PDT)

Joanne, you are so smart! I bet that's it! Maybe it
will be on KIDULT album.

--- Joanne Cochran  wrote:
> 
> 
> >At 06:21 PM 10/02/1999 -0400, Brenda and Larry
> Clough wrote:
> >>And-is- the song on the album?  Was this ever
> positively determined?
> >
> >
> >It is not on the album.  I suspect promoters may
> have figured that parents
> >might not approve of their children singing along
> to a tune about greed and
> >"making it mine".
> >
> >phantm
> >
> 
> 
> When we saw the movie last night, we noticed in the
> song credits that
> Mandy's song was produced by Nonesuch Records.  Is
> it possible that his song
> is not on the Elmo album because his record label
> will not let him appear on
> other labels?
> 
> / Joanne
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy's Elmo song
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 20:20:24 EDT

In a message dated 10/3/99 7:15:43 PM EST, [email protected] writes:

<< When we saw the movie last night, we noticed in the song credits that
 Mandy's song was produced by Nonesuch Records.  Is it possible that his song
 is not on the Elmo album because his record label will not let him appear on
 other labels? >>

Then maybe it'll be on the Kidult album recording in Jan!!!!!!
Ina

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy's Elmo song
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 20:26:09 EDT

In a message dated 10/3/99 5:02:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< When we saw the movie last night, we noticed in the song credits that
 Mandy's song was produced by Nonesuch Records.  Is it possible that his song
 is not on the Elmo album because his record label will not let him appear on
 other labels?
 
 / Joanne
  >>

..and maybe, just maybe it might be on his new cd??

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy's Elmo song
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 17:47:49 -0700

At 5:00 PM -0700 10/3/99, Joanne Cochran wrote:
>When we saw the movie last night, we noticed in the song credits that
>Mandy's song was produced by Nonesuch Records.  Is it possible that his song
>is not on the Elmo album because his record label will not let him appear on
>other labels?
>
>/ Joanne

That is another possibility that I considered, as the same thing happened
with the Chicago Hope soundtrack.  Mandy's songs were supposed to appear on
that CD (and advertised as such), only to fall through.  In that case, I am
pretty certain it was Nonesuch that balked.

phantm
############################################################
The Peter MacNicol Page         Mandy Patinkin Showcase
http://www.petermacnicol.net  http://www.mandypatinkin.net
############################################################

----------------Message-boundary

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: second episode
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 17:58:30 -0700 (PDT)

Does anyone have an extra tape of the second episode?
My VCR was on the fritz and I didn't know it until I
went to replay the tape. 
Thanks,
Renee

=====

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

----------------Message-boundary--


-- End --