To: [email protected] Subject: Mail digest Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 0:01:53 +0200 (METDST) ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Strange Justice thoughts Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 17:55:00 EDT In a message dated 8/31/99 9:54:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << there was a character on Sex and The City last week..... >> Yep, and he might just fit the bill for Carol ;-> Plus she might get some great new shoes out of it ... ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: OFF: More Clarence (was Re: Mandy & SJ) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 17:57:52 EDT In a message dated 9/1/99 1:38:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << Well said, Bev!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >> Thanks, Barbara! One little news item I forgot to mention vis-a-vis Mr. Clinton ... seems Monica's dad, Dr. Lewinsky, got some interesting mail the other day. A solicitation for campaign contributions ... .... from the Clintons ;-> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Strange Justice thoughts Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:00:12 EDT In a message dated 99-09-01 17:57:25 EDT, [email protected] writes: > Yep, and he might just fit the bill for Carol ;-> > > Plus she might get some great new shoes out of it ... > Hmmmmm.....I used to really be into new shoes, but now I find myself relying on my Birkies all the time. Carol P. ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: OFF: Shoes (was Re: Strange Justice thoughts) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:14:15 EDT In a message dated 9/1/99 3:02:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << Hmmmmm.....I used to really be into new shoes, but now I find myself relying on my Birkies all the time. >> I've never owned a pair of Birks. But some of my fellow female co-workers have decided to come up with a company muu-muu and the company shoes will be Birks ;-> ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CH Articles Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:17:31 EDT In a message dated 9/1/99 2:52:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << 50's and that she would be better for Phillip than Geiger. >> According to the IMDB, she was born in February of 1948, so she's going on 52. That's only a 4-year age difference between her and MP. Nobody better say a word about it, either, cuz I'm 6 years older than my hubby ;-> >> and his real wife is even more than that....... ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OFF: Shoes (was Re: Strange Justice thoughts) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:31:04 EDT In a message dated 99-09-01 18:16:04 EDT, [email protected] writes: > But some of my fellow female co-workers > have decided to come up with a company muu-muu and the company shoes will be > > Birks ;-> WHERE do I apply??? Oh...that's right...Southern California...that's a bit further west than I'm wanting to move (not that virtually ANYWHERE doesn't look preferable to Atlanta [except of course if Mandy's here]). Carol P. ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CH Articles Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:14:30 -0700 (PDT) I thought he was 46...she's 51 if she was born in 48, I know because hubby was too. --- [email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 8/31/99 6:23:43 PM Pacific > Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > << Does anyone know how old Barbara Hershey is? I > thought she was in her > 50's and that she would be better for Phillip than > Geiger. >> > > According to the IMDB, she was born in February of > 1948, so she's going on > 52. That's only a 4-year age difference between her > and MP. Nobody better say > a word about it, either, cuz I'm 6 years older than > my hubby ;-> > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OFF: More Clarence (was Re: Mandy & SJ) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Didn't you see him on Larry King? He was saying what a wonderful man Clinton was. UNBELIEVABLE! --- [email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 9/1/99 1:38:40 AM Pacific > Daylight Time, [email protected] > writes: > > << Well said, Bev!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >> > > Thanks, Barbara! > > One little news item I forgot to mention vis-a-vis > Mr. Clinton ... seems > Monica's dad, Dr. Lewinsky, got some interesting > mail the other day. > > A solicitation for campaign contributions ... > > .... from the Clintons ;-> > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OFF: More on Clarence (was Re: Mandy & SJ) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:25:59 -0500 At 05:33 PM 9/1/99 EDT, [email protected] wrote: >I was full of hope and joy when Clinton was elected, thinking that finally >we'd chosen someone who could truly be an instrument for change, for making >our country better. I have been bitterly disappointed by his personal >behavior, even while the good ol' US of A continues to roll along in an >economic frenzy. So there's that -- I'm sure many other so-called "liberal" >women feel the same way; betrayed. And it's hard to speak out when you've >been betrayed. There are the "I told you so's" to deal with; and the sheer >embarrassment of having been taken in. I share your disappointment. I too had hoped Clinton would be a shining light after the dim supply-side morass of George Herbert Etcetera Bush. And his first few months in office seemed to bear out that promise -- his almost immediate "reinstatement" of Roe v. Wade etc, though he never should have waffled on the gays in the military thing. So it was dismaying that he turned out to be so head-shakingly stupid in where he put his... well, you know. But I was impressed that, even as he was embroiled in the impeachment proceedings, and prolly getting seventeen kinds of hell from Hil every minute of the day (not that he didn't deserve it!) he was still going about business and actually accomplishing things. >None of Clinton's behavior constituted an impeachable offense, IMHO. But had >I known all this before his first Presidential election, I seriously doubt if >I would've voted for him. > Ditto about the impeachment farce. But if it were public knowledge that he'd done this kind of thing BEFORE his presidential campaign, I sort of doubt we'd have had a chance to vote for him. DR ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: TV Guide Sept 4th Issue Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 20:53:53 EDT Doesn't Mandy look wonderful in that picture? I love how the knit shirt makes him look, better than ever. I wish he'd let his hair grow just a bit longer. Counting the days till 9/23 for the CH season premiere. Karen ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CH Articles Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 20:35:06 -0700 >In a message dated 8/31/99 6:23:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, >[email protected] writes: > ><< Does anyone know how old Barbara Hershey is? I thought she was in her > 50's and that she would be better for Phillip than Geiger. >> > >According to the IMDB, she was born in February of 1948, so she's going on >52. That's only a 4-year age difference between her and MP. Nobody better say >a word about it, either, cuz I'm 6 years older than my hubby ;-> Anyway, Kathryn is in her 50's.....he likes older women :> Carol, an older woman ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TV Guide Sept 4th Issue Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 00:20:24 -0700 Karen wrote: >Doesn't Mandy look wonderful in that picture? I love how the knit shirt >makes him look, better than ever. I just hope whoever put him in that shirt is doing the costuming for CH this year! Mmmm, mmmm, mmmmmm!!! I can't say much for what they made the women dress in but the men all look delicious! If they keep this up, I would be willing to vote them a costuming Emmy! Not that I get a vote, but why let that stop me? / Joanne --> can't seem to put TV Guide down ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CH Articles Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 17:57:07 EDT In a message dated 9/1/99 4:15:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << I thought he was 46...she's 51 if she was born in 48, I know because hubby was too. >> Yes, she's 51 -- she'll be 52 in February 2000. And MP will be 47 in November. Ergo, 4 years difference ;-) ----------------Message-boundary From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OFF: More Clarence (was Re: Mandy & SJ) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 17:57:55 EDT In a message dated 9/1/99 4:18:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: << Didn't you see him on Larry King? He was saying what a wonderful man Clinton was. UNBELIEVABLE! >> Who was saying that? Dr. Lewinsky? I don't watch Larry King; I keep thinking he's either gonna get married again or drop dead of a heart attack, live on TV ;-> ----------------Message-boundary-- -- End --