From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Mail digest
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 20:43:29 +0200 (METDST)
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Mandy and Elmo on TV this morning
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:30:46 EDT
I was wathing the KUSI Morning News here in San Diego and one of the anchors, Laura Buxton, interviewed (via satellite) Mandy and Elmo. It was very cute! They both pretty much ran the interview. It was all Laura could do to try to keep up! They mentioned that they were in talks with Sondheim to bring Elmo in Grouchland to Broadway (ha ha). Mandy was wearing a WHITE golf shirt and was laughing and joking. It made my Monday!
Sheila
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy in CH
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:27:57 EDT
In a message dated 9/27/99 6:55:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]
writes:
<< << DR <-- whipping out a resume for continuity consultant >>
While you're at it, send one to FOX. They need for for X-Files ;-
>> Gee, ya think?? ;) >>
Oh, yeah. By now, the mytharc has so many holes in it the damn thing is a
step *below* Swiss cheese.
Yeah, I still love it. And yet ... hell, don't get me started.
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy in CH
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:29:08 EDT
In a message dated 9/27/99 7:19:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]
writes:
<< Firstly, the widow was definitely Veronica Cartwright. She most recently
had a recurring role on X-Files. I believe she'd be known in Phile circles as
Ratboy's Mother. >>
No, no!!! She played Cassandra Spender, the mother of Jeffrey Spender, whose
father is CSM.
Ratboy is Krycek. He obviously has no parents
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy in CH
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:03:24 -0500
>>> 09/27/99 01:29PM >>>
In a message dated 9/27/99 7:19:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]=
m=20
writes:
>No, no!!! She played Cassandra Spender, the mother of >Jeffrey Spender, =
whose father is CSM.
>Ratboy is Krycek. He obviously has no parents
Well, then, Spender is WeaselBoy, I think. I get my vermin confused.
DR <-- no offense to any rats or weasels out there
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: unsubscribe
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:02:12, -0500
unsubscribe
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Subscribe
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:57:05 -0400
subscribe
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: SNOOPS off
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 17:17:39 EDT
well, I must say one of the two (and only) good things about this show is
that Yonda Shepherd doesn't sing the songtrack----the other being Danny
Nucci......
I could not get past the pouting, posing lips of Gina Gershon..excpet when
she spoke..and the lips didn't move. To compare this show with Nash
Bridges..as I read somewhere..is a travesty..DEK or not. And I had read this
was part of a contract deal DEK had with ABC....it shows. There is hardly a
redeeming quality in the shwo..except maybe the music .
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Probable Mandy Mention
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:39:27 -0700
I heard that Elmo will be on CNN's Showbiz Today show tomorrow,
discussing his film career. Im sure they will show clips from Elmo in
Grouchland which opens Friday. Laurie
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SNOOPS off
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 17:49:54 EDT
In a message dated 9/27/99 2:19:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< well, I must say one of the two (and only) good things about this show is
that Yonda Shepherd doesn't sing the songtrack----the other being Danny
Nucci...... >>
Vonda, Smitty ... with a "V", babe ;-> And I *like* Vonda!
Anyway, it wasn't the total suckfest I was expecting, but it wasn't exactly
scintillating either.
>> I could not get past the pouting, posing lips of Gina Gershon..excpet when
she spoke..and the lips didn't move. <<
This was one of the biggest problems I had with the entire show. If that
woman doesn't close her mouth occasionally, she's gonna end up swallowin' a
whole mess of flies. And what's with the lighting? Amazing how the
entertainment bidness can take a perfectly lovely young woman and highlight
her right into ugly.
>> To compare this show with Nash Bridges..as I read somewhere..is a
travesty..DEK or not. <<
Oh, yes, Nash Bridges is *much* better ... unless you like a plot, a story
and continuity
>> There is hardly a redeeming quality in the shwo..except maybe the music .
>>
That's one thing I did like -- the soundtrack. Had me tappin' my tootsies,
though mostly on the screen to shut out the horror of those LIPS.
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:10:17 EDT
In a message dated 99-09-26 17:44:10 EDT, [email protected] writes:
> Are we *all* fours?
Nope, I'm a 9 (which is as close to a "10" as you can get in this!)
Carol P.
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mandy in CH
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:10:48 EDT
In a message dated 9/27/99 12:01:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]
writes:
<< Well, then, Spender is WeaselBoy, I think. I get my vermin confused.
DR <-- no offense to any rats or weasels out there >>
That's more like it ;->
On behalf of Ratfans everywhere, we thank you.
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:13:50 EDT
In a message dated 99-09-26 17:44:10 EDT, [email protected] writes:
> Are we *all* fours?
Just realized that my HUSBAND is a 4 too!
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: From the New York Times
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 18:04:04 EDT
In a message dated 99-09-26 15:50:44 EDT, [email protected] writes:
> Well, we *knew* he was always the best
...ever! :-)
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:09:28 -0400
At 5:42 PM 9/26/99, wrote:
><< To get a birth number you add all the numbers in a birthdate - and keep
>adding them - until you get to a single figure. Mandy's are:
>
>>> 1+1+3+0+1+9+5+2=22 .... 2+2=4 or 11+30+1952=1993 .... 1+9+9+3=22
>There are all sorts of ways to count it, some initially ending up with 13 -
>which is 4!
>Mine is July 9, 1950
>Any other 4s on the list? >>
>
>Mine is 12-14-1949.
>
>1+2+1+4+1+9+4+9 = 31 = 4!
>Or 12+14+1949 = 1975, then 1+9+7+5 = 22, then 2+2 = 4!
>
>Are we *all* fours?
I'm a six. 9-6-1944
9+6+1+9+4+4=33 = 3+3 =6
or 1944+9+6 =1959 then, 1+9+5+9= 24 and 2+4=6
I've been to psychics before and they've always said that 6 was a lucky
number for me. I wonder if this is what they use to determine that.
Rene
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:11:43 -0500
At 6:10 PM -0400 9/27/99, wrote:
>In a message dated 99-09-26 17:44:10 EDT, [email protected] writes:
>
>> Are we *all* fours?
>
>Nope, I'm a 9 (which is as close to a "10" as you can get in this!)
>
>Carol P.
Except, as I've just explained, that 9 equals 0 ...
Kendal
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:54:07 EDT
In a message dated 99-09-27 20:09:00 EDT, [email protected] writes:
> Except, as I've just explained, that 9 equals 0 ...
ppppllllbbbbppptttt!
:-P
Actually I think what you explained was NOT that 9 equals 0 but rather that 9
has no effect on the actual calculation - a subtle, but important difference.
Also note that while 9 may have no effect on the calculation, it can indeed
be the final result whereas 0 will never be a "birth number."
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:30:41 EDT
Im a 6 also! (Wanting to be a 4!)
Taylor
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:35:10 EDT
No, I guess i was wong, I'm a 2! 6-7-1962
Taylor
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: I'm baaaaaaack
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:29:12 -0500
Hi Mandy-list people!
I was on the MP list a long time ago...I unsubbed when my marriage started
to head south. We're divorced now. Life is at last calming down.
And I finally found you all again...
Anyway, do you remember me? Probably not, but I remember a few of you. Its
neat to see Diane and Kendall still on the list. I think Ioana must still
subscribe since she's forwarded a few things from time to time.
I just bought tickets to see MP in Fort Worth at the new Bass Performance
Hall in two weeks. I know on what I make teaching voice plus my child
support money and with my huge lawyer bills I shouldn't probably spend
money that way but even single moms just gotta have fun. And let's just say
the quality of performance makes the $50 a good value, eh? I can't wait. I
haven't seen him in maybe three years? I hope he still meets fans afterward.
I saw him a few years ago when he sang at the Meyerson in Dallas. Had last
row third balcony nose-bleed seats but there really isn't a bad seat in
that house for sound. He was incredible, of course! When I finally came
face to face with the man, Oh! He was so gracious. For the few minutes that
I had his attention it truly was his undivided attention and it was heaven.
Anyway. Good to be back. Hope all is well for everyone. Looking forward to
getting caught up on the Mandy relate news and other what-not on this list.
Jenny
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:43:47 EDT
In a message dated 99-09-27 22:16:38 EDT, [email protected] writes:
> No, I guess i was wong, I'm a 2! 6-7-1962
Uh...it adds up to 4 when I do it...
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: better billing???
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:48:26 +1000
>THE ADVENTURES OF ELMO IN GROUCHLAND [Columbia - G]
>Starring Elmo, Bert, Ernie, Oscar the Grouch, Mandy Patinkin, Vanessa
Williams.
Here in Aust Mandy has had second billing in everything I've seen - after
Kevin Clash (Elmo puppeteer).
Going to see it for the THIRD time on Thursday! :>
SueH
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:02:05 -0700
Where'd you get 2 from??? 6+7+1+9+6+2=31 3+1=4
Isn't that right?
Jason in Phoenix, who is a 7! 4/21/1980
[email protected] wrote:
>
> No, I guess i was wong, I'm a 2! 6-7-1962
>
> Taylor
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:40:16 +1000
At 09:35 27/09/99 EDT, Taylor wrote:
>No, I guess i was wong, I'm a 2! 6-7-1962
No you're not, Taylor - you're a 4 too!
Your birthdate numbers add upto 31 and 3+1 is 4. If you disregard the '9'
you end up with 22, which also equals 4. (Don't know where you got the '2'
from).
Looks like I really started something here! For those of you who would
*like* to be a 4, but aren't - maybe you'll have better luck with your name
number. This formula is good to get numbers not just for names but anything
where you need numbers - like Lotto games etc!
Write the numbers 1-9 across - with small gaps between. Then write the
alphabet under those. (The letters under #1 should be A, J and S).
"MANDY" adds upto 21 and "PATINKIN" = 40 = 61 = 7 - there's 3 numbers to
use in things, already!
His 'name number' is 7, for the name he uses most of the time - but change
the 'Mandy' to Mandel and maybe add in the Bruce - and it's a different
number. (That's why some people spell their names 'funny' - there's a Simon
in business here who spells it "Siimon").
That formula is the main way I pick numbers for the weekly lotto type draws
here - and how I won the $4,000+ I bought this computer with! :)
SueH
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:09:33 EDT
Okay, I guess I was wrong. I am a 4. Thanks for pointing it out. (Feeling
very weak in the area of counting simple numbers.)
Taylor
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: I'm baaaaaaack
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:12:19 -0500
>>> Jennifer Jacobson 09/27/99 10:29PM >>>
>Its
neat to see Diane and Kendall still on the list.=20
I'll bet you thought we'd both have been kicked off by now... ;)
Welcome back, Jenny!
DR
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: MP: (OFF) Late Night Line-Ups [late!]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 00:10:50 +1000
I'm doing this while the Monday night Letterman is on (just started) - it's
just after midnight Wednesday morning here. I'll take all the Monday 27th
stuff off as it's gone!
LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN, CBS
Tu 9/28 Nathan Lane, Synch swimmer Bill May, Linda Ronstadt, Emmylou Harris
We 9/29 Mia Farrow, Russell Crowe, Paula Cole
Th 9/30 Kevin Spacey, Eurythmics
Fr 10/1 Kelsey Grammer, Rebecca Gayheart
Mo 10/4 Harrison Ford, David Bowie
Tu 10/5 Dan Quayle, Melissa Etheridge
We 10/6 Lily Tomlin, Leah Remini, Beth Hart
Th 10/7 Will Ferrell, Peter Fonda
THE TONIGHT SHOW WITH JAY LENO, NBC
Tu 9/28 Yasmine Bleeth, Steve Zahn, Smokey Robinson
We 9/29 Noah Wyle, Shannen Doherty, Elvis Costello
Th 9/30 George Clooney, 6-year-old Durst quadruplets
Fr 10/1 Keri Russell, Bruce McCulloch, Meredith Brooks, Queen Latifah
Mo 10/4 Arsenio Hall, Alyssa Milano
Tu 10/5 Jenny McCarthy, Clint Black
We 10/6 Elisabeth Shue, crocodile hunter Steve Irvin
Th 10/7 Liv Tyler
LATE LATE SHOW WITH CRAIG KILBORN, CBS
Tu 9/28 Yasmine Bleeth, Master P
We 9/29 Ted Danson, Holly Marie Combs
Th 9/30 George Clooney, Robert Palmer
Fr 10/1 Ashley Judd, Barry Williams
Mo 10/4 David Boreanaz, Bonnie McFarlane
Tu 10/5 Melissa Joan Hart, Eric Idle
We 10/6 Meat Loaf, Rebecca Gayheart
Th 10/7 Jay Thomas, Jeri Ryan
Fr 10/8 Judd Nelson
LATE NIGHT WITH CONAN O'BRIEN, NBC
Tu 9/28 Sarah Michelle Gellar, Garth Brooks
We 9/29 Isabella Rossellini
Th 9/30 Brooke Shields, Peter Gallagher, Filter
Fr 10/1 Kevin Spacey, Christina Applegate
Mo 10/4 Rob Schneider, Richard Belzer, Luscious Jackson (R)
Tu 10/5 Molly Shannon, Wes Bentley
We 10/6 Steven Wright
Th 10/7 D.B. Sweeney
POLITICALLY INCORRECT WITH BILL MAHER, ABC
Tu 9/28 Bruce Vilanch, Nancy Travis, Al Rantel, citizen panelist Lydia Justice
We 9/29 Laura Innes, Meat Loaf, Darlene Kennedy, Master P
Th 9/30 Deborah Norville, Niger Innis, Brian McKnight
Fr 10/1 Jeri Ryan, Joshua Bell, Sheila Moloney
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:20:24 -0500
At 9:35 PM -0400 9/27/99, wrote:
>No, I guess i was wong, I'm a 2! 6-7-1962
>
> Taylor
And, as we all know, two Wongs don't make a white.
K
----------------Message-boundary
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MP: Mandy's birth number
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:35:05 -0500
At 8:54 PM -0400 9/27/99, wrote:
>In a message dated 99-09-27 20:09:00 EDT, [email protected] writes:
>
>> Except, as I've just explained, that 9 equals 0 ...
>
>ppppllllbbbbppptttt!
>
>:-P
>
>Actually I think what you explained was NOT that 9 equals 0 but rather that 9
>has no effect on the actual calculation - a subtle, but important difference.
> Also note that while 9 may have no effect on the calculation, it can indeed
>be the final result whereas 0 will never be a "birth number."
OK, OK. Now let me explain what this is *really* good for besides picking
lotto numbers. It's called the "proof by nine" and I learned it in the
third grade in a third world country but was not allowed to use it when I
returned to the US and entered the eighth grade because the teacher didn't
understand it. Childhood trauma indeed!
Let's say you're adding:
27+
13
45
= 85
Now you reduce all the numbers down to their, er, number.
2+7 = 9 = zilch
1+3 = 4
4+5 = 9 = zilch
So that gives us 4, right?
Now reduce 85 to 13 = 4, right? So the addition was correct. It also works
for subtraction, multiplication, and addition, of course. Or, as Lewis
Carroll put it, sedition, distraction, uglification and derision.
It can give you false positives, of course, if the digits in your wrong
answer just happen to add up to the correct result. But it will never tell
you that a correct answer is wrong.
Kendal -- at it again
----------------Message-boundary--
-- End --